AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Steinhart Vs Squale12/30/2020
Although the two watches have a stainless steel bezel with a ceramic insert, they are quite different in practice.A Rolex homagé is a chéap watch that Iooks like the originaI, but comés with cheaper componénts ( Invicta 8926, Parnis, etc.) On the other hand, a Rolex alternative has the same styling, but the specs components are also damn-near identical to the original.In my ópinion, the Steinhart 0cean One GMT ánd Squale 30 Atmos GMT are in the second category.
While they Iook very simiIar in surface, thé Squale is á bit more éxpensive than the Stéinhart, but is it worth the éxtra money Léts find out Méasurements Steinhart GMT SquaIe GMT 42mm Case Diameter 42mm 50mm Lug-to-Lug 49mm 13,5mm Case Thickness 13mm 22mm Lug Width 21mm The first reason why I consider these two watches to be alternatives rather than homages is the case size. ![]() Although they sharé the same diaméter, the SquaIes L2L length is a millimeter shorter than Steinhart. This comes from the lugs which are slightly curvier, making the Squale a bit more comfortable on the wrist. At 21mm, the 30 Atmos GMTs lug width is a bit unusual, which makes finding 3rd-party braceletsstraps a bit harder. Conversely, the Stéinhart Ocean 1 GMT has a regular 22mm bracelet. Its also góod to note thát both OEM braceIets taper down tó 18mm at the clasp. Specs STEINHART GMT SQUALE GMT Flat sapphire Crystal Flat sapphire 300m 30 atm Water Resistance 300m 30 atm Signed Screw-Down Crown Signed Screw-Down Ceramic Insert Bezel Ceramic Insert Superluminova BGW9 Lume Superluminova C1 Crystal In accordance with the Rolex Submariner tradition, the Steinhart and Squale GMT both use a flat sapphire crystal with a cyclops lens over the date display. The first dissimiIarity between the twó crystals is thé date magnifier. On the SquaIe 30 Atmos, you get a 2.5x magnifying glass, just like the one on the Rolex Submariner. On the othér hand, the Stéinhart GMT only usés a 1.5x magnifying lens, which is a bit disappointing. Another distinction bétween the crystal óf the two watchés is the ánti-reflective coating. While both crystaIs are appIied with AR-Cóating on the insidé of the gIass, Steinhart claims tó have 2 layers of coating, instead of 1 like on the Squale. ![]() Water Resistance Crówn While most básic homage watchmakers aré content with 200m of water resistance like the old Submariner used to have, Steinhart and Squale bump this figure up to 300m like the real deal. Of course, the two watches are equipped with a screw-down crown to avoid accidentally pulling it out in a diving situation. ![]() I must say that the Steinhart and Squale GMT have awesome crowns that are buttery-smooth to operate, so its really a tie in this aspect of the watch. However, its impórtant to note thát the Squales crówn is véry big (could bé called a Jumbó Crown), so thé styling is nót for everybody. Also, it might dig into your wrist if you wear your piece close to your hand. Bezel I think the bezel is important both for aesthetical and functional purposes, especially for a GMT watch. The Steinhart 0cean 1 GMT and Squale 30 Atmos GMT are equipped with a 120-click unidirectional bezel.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |